What is the difference between contemporary music and free jazz ?
[ Music Theory ]
[ Music Theory ]
Posts
This is Kloug
9 posts | 1 Posted on 01/27/2008 at 23:42 So what ? | ||
Mustrum
15 posts | 2 Posted on 01/28/2008 at 01:00 It reminds me of this : "Once, it's a mistake. Twice, it's Jazz." | ||
Alosely
9 posts | 3 Posted on 01/29/2008 at 18:10 Hum... It's totally different : contemporary music is playing noise with musical instruments. Free jazz, is playing noise with musical instruments... But it's jazz (This is a flag) MySpace | "Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love" A. Einstein | ||
liverpool
15 posts | 4 Posted on 01/30/2008 at 00:28 Intellectual topics by Kloug... I love them ! The story of life is quicker than the wink of an eye/The story of Love is just hello and goodbye/Until we meet again (Jimi Hendrix) | ||
kon-tiki
611 posts | 5 Posted on 01/30/2008 at 11:12 Improvisation! | ||
This is Kloug
9 posts | 6 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 01:40 Not always. http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=S86WzxIbolw | ||
pastoche
24 posts | 7 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 09:56 The style The name etc... There's a lot of things you'll never make in jazz, and its free from any other styles, so you can call it contemporary music. ![]() CONCOURS AF ACAP REMIX --- My ReMix --- --- PLAY --- ---Homepage --- Concours AF Acap Remix | ||
MrKermit
26 posts | 8 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 10:19 If it's ugly and boring, it's contemporary music. If it's just boring, it's jazz | ||
Alosely
9 posts | 9 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 11:04 Quote : If it's ugly and boring, it's contemporary music. I don't agree : this is contemporary music, and it's totally ![]() MySpace | "Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love" A. Einstein | ||
kon-tiki
611 posts | 10 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 14:43 If it doesn't have improvisation then it isn't jazz in my book. it's just contemporary classicial music, or comtemporary whatever. jazz needs improvisation. |



